Clicking on the document name will show you the first page. You can then decide if to download the entire pdf document.
(Doc #1) The 1991 document which affects BayCrest southern property line units.
(Doc #2) Transcript of first Planning Commission hearing.
April 9, 2009
(Doc #3) Andrews letter to the Commission. April 14, 2009
(Doc #4) Transcript of second Planning Commission hearing.
May 14, 2009
(Doc #5) The Planning Commission approval of 430 Main.
May 14, 2009
(Doc #6) 430 Main victory announcement in SF Business Times. May 15, 2009.
(Doc #7) The Zoning Administration Decision approving variances for 430 Main, May 26, 2009.
(Doc #8) 430 Main property information.
(Doc #9) Procedure for appealing with the San Francisco Board of Appeals.
(Doc #10) Notification to developer of the BayCrest Team filing of Appeal with the Board of Appeals against the San Francisco Planning Commission decision to approve 430 Main. May 29, 2009.
(Doc #11) Appeal against granting of variances to 430 Main. June 3, 2009.
(Doc #12) Notification to developer of the BayCrest Team filing of Appeal with the Board of Appeals against the San Francisco Zoning Administrations approval of the Variances granted 430 Main. June 5, 2009.
(Doc #13) Agenda for the Board of Appeals hearing on August 5, 2009.
(Doc #14) Brief submitted by the BayCrest Team for the Planning Commission appeal. Author BayCrest owner volunteer Dane Ince. July 9, 2009.
(Doc #15) Brief submitted by the BayCrest Team for the appeal to the Zoning Administration. Author BayCrest owner volunteer Dane Ince July 9, 2009.
(Doc #16) Rebuttal by the developers law firm to BayCrest Appeal brief to the Planning Commission.July 23, 2009
(Doc #17) Rebuttal by the developers law firm to BayCrest Appeal brief to the Zoning Administration.July 23, 2009.
(Doc #18) Points brought up by BayCrest owners to the Board of Appeals.
(Doc #19) FAQ of the Article 38 of the San Francisco Health Code: Roadway Air Pollution Hot Spots.
(Doc #19a) Ord#281-08 amending the SF Health code by adding new Article 38 to require air quality assessment and ventilation for certain urban infill residential developments.
(Doc #20) The Rincon Hill Plan.
(Doc #21) Article on Health and Traffic Caused Pollution in San Francisco neighborhoods.
(Doc #22) Article on San Francisco Attempts to Reduce Pollution at New Residential Developments.
(Doc #23) Presentation: "Re-integrating Health and Land Use Planning: Steps towards Institutional Accountability to the Publics Health" by Rajiv Bhatia, MD, MPH San Francisco Department of Public Health.
(Doc #24) Article: "Integrating Human Health into Environmental Impact Assessment: An unrealized Opportunity for Environmental Health and Justice." Bhatia and Wemham, San Francisco Dept of Public Health.
(Doc #25) Article: "Protecting Health Using an Enviromental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of San Francisco Land Use Decision Making" Bhatia, MD, MPH San Francisco Dept of Public Health.
(Doc #25a) Article: "Assessment and Mitigation of Air Pollutant Health effects from Intra-urban Roadways: guidance for Land Use Planning and Environmental Review" Rajiv Bhatia, Thomas Rivard May 6, 2008 San Francisco Dept of Public Health.
(Doc #26) A typical wind study: "The Effect of a Tall Tower On Flow and Dispersion Through a Model Urban Neighborhood."
(Doc #26a) Sensitivity of the AERMOD Air Quality Model to the Selection of Land Use Parameters. Trinity Consultants, August 4, 1999.
(Doc #26b) Comparison of Two Dispersion Models: A Bulk Petroleum Storage Terminal Case Study. Trinity Consultants, September 20, 2006.
(Doc #26c) CEQA Draft Air Quality Guidelines. September 2009.
(Doc #27) The three page "wind" report 430 Main submitted to the Planning Commission. Nov 21, 2008
(Doc #27a) Memo showing low pollution numbers. March 11, 2008
(Doc #27b) Memo showing high pollution count less than a block away. June 27, 2008.
(Doc #28) Certificate of Determination which exempts 430 Main from Environmental Review. Feb 23, 2009.
(Doc #29) What is CEQA?
(Doc #30) Expert opinion by Jan Null, Certified Consulting Meteorologist. Oct. 16, 2009
(Doc #31) Expert report: "Preliminary Review of CEQA Determination for 430 Main Street Project" Richard Grasetti, Grassetti Environmental Consulting July 8, 2009.
(Doc #31a Final Version) Expert report: "Review of CEQA Determination for 430 Main Street Project" Richard Grasetti, Grassetti Environmental Consulting October 14, 2009.
(Doc #32) Andrews letter to the Board of Appeals on behalf of BayCrest. July 30, 2009.
(Doc #33) Transcript, Board of Appeals Hearing. August 5, 2009
(Doc #34) Brief for rehearing appeal. August 17, 2009 with exhibits. 89 pages Author: BayCrest owner volunteer Devlin Gardella.
(Doc #35) Brief for rehearing appeal. August 17, 2009 without exhibits. 7 pages Author:
BayCrest owner volunteer
Devlin Gardella.
(Doc #36) BayCrest proposed alternate workable design. Aug. 17, 2009
(Doc #37) Developers Rebuttal to BayCrest Teams rehearing request. August 27, 2009.
(Doc #38) Procedure for appeal with the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.
(Doc #39) BayCrest CEQA appeal with the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, Sept.8, 2009.
(Doc #40) LETTER FROM OUR LAWYER STEVE WILLIAMS TO THE SUPERVISORS (Important reading).
(Doc #41) Developer's lawyer's case to the Supervisors.
(Doc #42) Letter from the Planning Commission defending their original position.
(Doc #43) Agenda for the Supervisors, October 20, 2009 Hearing. (We are item #22, 23, 24 & 25)
(Doc #44) Board of Supersors Hearing procedure.
(Doc #45) Our lawyer Steve William's brief to the Board of Supervisors.
Go Back to Home Page: